WeSolve+ reads the whole document and writes the questions for you
Upload your PDF, photograph your notebook, or point the camera. WeSolve+ writes questions from that material, explains why each answer is right, reads the chapter back to you as a podcast, and remembers every item you missed until you own it.
The tool below is a small browser-only tool and it is not WeSolve+: paste a few lines and text rules turn them into cards on the spot. The real app, the one that uses AI, is behind the link above.
Statements into true or false practice
This is a browser-only tool, and that is all it isIt splits the text you paste by rule, and nothing else. WeSolve+ is a different thing entirely: it reads your whole PDF with AI, writes the reasoning behind every question, speaks the chapter back to you, and remembers what you missed so it can return it. Try the real app now, free!
This tool uses text rules, not AI. Write each statement with its verdict after a colon, "statement: true" or "statement: false, correction", and it becomes a practice item with the verdict hidden; statements without a verdict lose their most distinctive word instead. The tool formats your judgements; it does not invent verdicts, because a rule cannot know what is true.
The fifty percent problem, and the fix that fixes it
A blind coin passes half of any true or false quiz, which is why the format has a bad name in testing circles. The repair is one rule: false earns credit only with the correction. "False" is a guess; "false, the Nile flows north" is knowledge. Grade the fix, not the verdict, and the format's speed stops being a weakness, because now every item quietly contains a short answer question.
One idea per statement, or the item judges nothing
"Mitochondria produce ATP and are found only in animal cells" is half true, and whichever verdict a student picks, you cannot tell which half they judged. Split compound claims into single idea statements so a verdict means one thing. The same discipline bans double negatives, "it is not untrue that", which test parsing rather than knowledge, and keeps statements quotable: short enough to hold in mind whole.
Absolute words are a tell, so use them on purpose
Test wise students know that always, never, all and none usually mark false statements, while usually, often and may mark true ones. Fight the tell by breaking it deliberately: write true statements that survive an always, gravity always points toward mass, and false ones dressed in soft qualifiers. If your set's absolutes all point one way, the quiz can be beaten by style reading alone, without a fact in sight.
Where true or false beats other formats, and where it loses
The format shines for fact density: twenty verdicts fit in the time five multiple choice items take, which makes it ideal for warm ups, misconception sweeps and pre tests. It loses where nuance lives, anything that is true in one condition and false in another belongs in short answer, and it cannot probe reasoning unless the correction rule forces the why. Choose it for breadth, pair it with depth elsewhere.
How the generator fits this page
Write statements with verdicts, paste, and the tool builds practice items in the browser with verdicts hidden until revealed; statements without verdicts become supply the word items instead. Nothing uploads and nothing is stored. The tool deliberately does not guess truth: you supply the judgement once, and it drills that judgement back at you until the fix comes without looking.
Where the free tool ends and WeSolve+ begins
The tool drills the statements you already wrote; the app writes the drill from the source. Upload a PDF and WeSolve+ generates mixed question sets with the reasoning behind every answer, tracks which claims you keep misjudging in its weak topic analysis, and returns them spaced until the verdicts stick. Draft your statements here; let the app carry the month's load.
Sources used on this page
- Multiple choice
- Test (assessment)
- Guessing
- Psychometrics
- Item response theory
- Classical test theory
- Reliability (statistics)
- Validity (statistics)
- Double negative
- Truth
- Proposition
- Misconception
- List of common misconceptions
- Testing effect
- Formative assessment
- Standardized test
- Test preparation
- Critical thinking
- Fact
- Fact-checking
- Quiz
- Binary opposition
- Ambiguity
- Educational assessment
- Grading in education
- Question
- Knowledge
- Metacognition
| Rule | Why it exists | The failure it prevents |
|---|---|---|
| Fix required on false | A verdict is a coin flip | Credit for guessing |
| One idea per statement | Verdicts must mean one thing | Untraceable half truths |
| No double negatives | Parsing is not knowledge | Reading tests in disguise |
| Break the absolute tell | Style readers beat the quiz | Factless passing |
| Short, quotable statements | Held in mind whole | Memory tests of syntax |
| Breadth here, depth elsewhere | Format fits fact density | Nuance forced into binary |
Does this tool decide what is true?
No, and on purpose: a text rule cannot know facts. You write the verdict after a colon and the tool turns it into hidden answer practice.
How do I stop students from coin flipping?
Require the correction on false answers and grade it. A verdict alone scores nothing; the fix is where the knowledge shows.
Why one idea per statement?
Compound claims make verdicts unreadable: you cannot tell which half was judged. Single idea statements make every verdict diagnostic.
Are absolute words really a tell?
In carelessly written sets, yes: always and never usually flag false. Break the pattern deliberately or the quiz rewards style reading.
When should I avoid true or false?
Where truth is conditional. Anything true in one case and false in another belongs in short answer or multiple choice with a because.
What does the WeSolve+ app add over this tool?
It writes the questions from your PDF with reasoning per answer, finds the claims you keep misjudging, and schedules them back until they hold.
Last updated: 2026-08-15