What comes back is not a report card, it is a list of things to sit down and do.
WeSolve+ reads the whole document and writes the questions for you
Upload your PDF, photograph your notebook, or point the camera. WeSolve+ writes questions from that material, explains why each answer is right, reads the chapter back to you as a podcast, and remembers every item you missed until you own it.
The tool below is a small browser-only tool and it is not WeSolve+: paste a few lines and text rules turn them into cards on the spot. The real app, the one that uses AI, is behind the link above.
Find your own weak topic by hand
This is a browser-only tool, and that is all it isIt splits the text you paste by rule, and nothing else. WeSolve+ is a different thing entirely: it reads your whole PDF with AI, writes the reasoning behind every question, speaks the chapter back to you, and remembers what you missed so it can return it. Try the real app now, free!
This tool uses text rules, not AI, and it has no memory of you. It shows the shape of the idea: write each miss as its topic, and the pattern becomes visible on one screen. The app does the grouping automatically because it sees every answer you give over weeks, which a browser page cannot. Your text stays in the browser and is never sent anywhere.
A score is not a diagnosis
Seven out of ten tells you the session was mediocre. It does not say whether you lost three marks across three unrelated ideas or three marks on the same idea three times, and those are completely different problems with completely different fixes. Grouping the misses is what turns a number into an assessment that informs the next step rather than one that just records the last one.
Topic and subject, not question
Individual questions almost never repeat in an exam. Topics repeat constantly, which is why the unit of analysis has to be the topic rather than the item. Recording each answer against both its topic and its subject means a pattern can surface across weeks: not that you missed question fourteen, but that equilibrium has cost you marks in four separate sessions since term started.
The output is work, not a chart
A dashboard showing a red bar next to a topic is information you already had, presented more attractively. What the app returns instead is a set of things to do: the PDFs worth sitting again, the flashcards for that topic, the spaced repetition sections that hold those items, and a short quiz on the specific thing that keeps failing. Each of those is an action with a start and an end.
After a quiz it says where to look, and explains the ones you got right
The result screen does not stop at ticks and crosses. It names what to concentrate on and what to leave alone, which is the harder half of the advice because leaving something alone feels like neglect. It also explains the answers you got right, since a correct answer reached by elimination is not the same as one you could reproduce, and only the explanation tells the two apart.
Why it needs weeks, not one session
One bad session tells you almost nothing. You were tired, the questions were new, the topic was covered that morning. A topic that keeps costing you across four sessions, spread over a fortnight, is a different signal entirely and it cannot be seen from inside a single sitting. This is the same reason analysis of learning data only becomes useful once there is history to look at.
Three lists, not one
Topics you know best, topics you need to work on, and topics you have mastered are kept separately, because they call for different actions. The mastered list is the one people underuse: its purpose is to tell you what you may stop revising, which is how an hour gets freed for the material that still costs you marks. A thirty day comparison against the previous week sits in the premium tier.
The trap it is built to avoid
Left alone, everybody revises what feels comfortable. Comfortable means the topic you already know, which produces a pleasant hour and no change in your mark. Working from the miss list means the session is harder and less enjoyable, which is precisely why it is worth doing: difficulty that feels bad during practice is the kind that shows up later as a mark.
What it does not claim
It does not know why you got something wrong. A miss can be a gap in knowledge, a misread question, or arithmetic under time pressure, and the record cannot tell those apart. The topic list points at the right place; deciding which of the three it was still needs you. That is a limit worth stating rather than dressing up, and it is why the plan is a starting point instead of an instruction.
Where this sits in WeSolve+
It runs on the questions you already answer, so there is nothing extra to set up. Upload a PDF, photograph a page or point the camera, answer what comes back, and the record builds itself. The analysis then feeds the deck and the review schedule. PDF, photograph or camera, whichever the material happens to be. Free to start on web and iPhone: pricing.
| Question | A score | Grouped by topic |
|---|---|---|
| Tells you how it went | Yes | Yes |
| Tells you what to do next | No | Yes, as a list of work |
| Survives one bad session | No, it just drops | Yes, the pattern needs weeks |
| Distinguishes three ideas from one idea three times | No | Yes, that is the point |
| Knows why you missed it | No | No, and it does not claim to |
| Produces something to sit down and do | No | PDFs, cards, sections, quick quiz |
Sources used on this page
- Formative assessment
- Learning analytics
- Educational data mining
- Item analysis
- Mastery learning
- Personalized learning
- Desirable difficulty
- Feedback
- Error analysis
- Curriculum
- Active recall
- Spaced repetition
- Testing effect
- Forgetting curve
- Judgment of learning
- Metacognition
- Educational assessment
- Test (assessment)
- Educational technology
- Flashcard
- Cloze test
- Multiple choice
- Distributed practice
- Study skills
- Overlearning
- Instructional scaffolding
- Learning management system
- Generation effect
- Study guide
What is weak topic analysis?
Your answers are recorded against the topic and subject they belong to, so misses collect instead of scattering. The app then names the topics costing you marks and turns them into work you can start.
How is that different from a score?
A score records the past. Seven out of ten cannot tell you whether you lost three marks on three ideas or on one idea three times, and those need opposite fixes.
What does it actually give me?
PDFs worth sitting again, the flashcards for that topic, the spaced repetition sections holding those items, and a short quiz on the specific thing that keeps failing.
How long before it is useful?
It needs weeks rather than one session. A single bad sitting can be tiredness or unfamiliar material; a topic that costs you across four sessions is a real signal.
Does it know why I got something wrong?
No. A miss can be a knowledge gap, a misread question or arithmetic under time pressure, and the record cannot separate those. It points at the place; you decide which it was.
Do I have to set anything up?
No. It runs on the questions you already answer, so the record builds itself from ordinary use.
Last updated: 2026-08-15