WeSolve+ reads the whole document and writes the questions for you
Upload your PDF, photograph your notebook, or point the camera. WeSolve+ writes questions from that material, explains why each answer is right, reads the chapter back to you as a podcast, and remembers every item you missed until you own it.
The tool below is a small browser-only tool and it is not WeSolve+: paste a few lines and text rules turn them into cards on the spot. The real app, the one that uses AI, is behind the link above.
Turn your LSAT notes into cards
This is a browser-only tool, and that is all it isIt splits the text you paste by rule, and nothing else. WeSolve+ is a different thing entirely: it reads your whole PDF with AI, writes the reasoning behind every question, speaks the chapter back to you, and remembers what you missed so it can return it. Try the real app now, free!
Text rules, not AI. Lines with a colon become two sided cards; other lines lose their longest word. Nothing you paste leaves the browser. Copy gives tab separated rows for Anki.
Question types are a closed list and behave like vocabulary
Strengthen, weaken, necessary assumption, sufficient assumption, flaw, parallel reasoning, principle. The list is short and finite, which makes it the ideal thing to drill, and the pairs inside it are treacherous: necessary and sufficient assumption sound alike and want opposite answers. A candidate who has to reconstruct the distinction mid section is paying twice, once in time and once in accuracy.
Your own wrong answer log outperforms any book
Every serious LSAT candidate keeps a log of missed questions and the reason. That log is the highest value study file you own, because it records your personal failure modes rather than the average candidate's. Photograph the pages or upload the file and the app turns your own explanations back into questions, which is the one thing rereading the log cannot do: it removes the answer you already wrote.
Conditional logic notation, and its limits here
Much of the reasoning on this exam is conditional, and candidates write it in arrow notation. Notation from your file is carried through rather than flattened, so a card about a contrapositive still looks like one. What the tool will not do is diagram a stimulus for you or evaluate whether your chain is valid; it drills the vocabulary and rules you wrote down, and the reasoning stays yours.
Spacing across a preparation cycle measured in months
LSAT preparation typically runs several months, which is precisely the interval where spacing helps most. Cepeda and colleagues, 2008, found the useful gap between reviews scales with how long the material must survive, so a candidate sitting the exam in four months should be revisiting question type definitions on a schedule rather than only when a drill goes badly. The app reshows cards on that pattern; the copy button exports them if your system already exists.
What this page will not tell you
No section counts, timings, scoring bands or score conversion appear here. LSAC holds and revises that information, and the sources below take you to it directly. A candidate budgeting practice time from a stale figure loses weeks, and a study page is the worst place to repeat a number from memory.
Cost, and what runs where
The box at the top makes no network request, so it is free, needs no account and has no limit. A drill set or a log is read by the app, which lives at wesolveapp.com and in the App Store for iPhone and iPad. Nothing is charged at the start. Per day you get two quizzes and two uploads, per week two recaps, per day two duels, and cards from any single file are not capped. Android is the site.
Sources used on this page
- LSAC, the LSAT
- LSAC, taking the LSAT
- LSAC, LSAT preparation
- LSAC, LSAT scoring
- LSAC, registering for the LSAT
- LSAC
- Law School Admission Test, encyclopaedia entry
- Roediger and Karpicke, Test-Enhanced Learning (2006)
- Karpicke and Roediger, the critical importance of retrieval (2008)
- Cepeda et al., distributed practice meta analysis (2006)
- Cepeda et al., spacing and the optimal retention interval (2008)
- Kornell and Bjork, is spacing the enemy of induction (2008)
- Dunlosky et al., improving students' learning (2013)
- Hermann Ebbinghaus, the forgetting curve (1885)
- What Works Clearinghouse, organizing instruction and study
- The Learning Scientists, retrieval practice
- Retrieval Practice, the research library
- Cloze test
- Active recall
- Spaced repetition
- Testing effect
- Leitner system
- SuperMemo, the SM-2 algorithm
- Anki manual, importing text files
- Anki manual, studying and scheduling
- MDN, the textarea element
- W3C, the disclosure pattern
- WeSolve+ on the App Store
| LSAT material | This browser box | The full app |
|---|---|---|
| Question type definitions | Two sided cards instantly | Cards plus an explained quiz |
| Wrong answer log PDF | Cannot read a PDF | Questions from your own explanations |
| Conditional logic notes | Notation carried through | A reason under each answer |
| Photographed drill pages | Cannot read a photo | Reads them and builds a set |
| Monthly definition review | None, you export | A scheduled return |
Can it drill necessary versus sufficient assumption?
Yes, if those definitions are in the material you give it. The fill in the blank output removes the distinguishing word, which is where the confusion actually lives.
Will it diagram arguments for me?
No. It builds recall from your notes. The diagramming and the reasoning stay yours, which is the part the exam is testing.
Can it use my wrong answer log?
Yes, as a PDF, a photograph or a camera shot. Turning the log into questions removes the answer you already wrote, which rereading cannot do.
Where do I find scoring information?
At LSAC, through the link in the sources below. This page does not restate scoring or timings.
Is the tool on this page free?
Yes, with no account and no ceiling, because nothing you paste leaves your browser.
Last updated: 2026-08-15