WeSolve+ keeps the record so the difference stops being a matter of memory and starts being something you can look at.
WeSolve+ reads the whole document and writes the questions for you
Upload your PDF, photograph your notebook, or point the camera. WeSolve+ writes questions from that material, explains why each answer is right, reads the chapter back to you as a podcast, and remembers every item you missed until you own it.
The tool below is a small browser-only tool and it is not WeSolve+: paste a few lines and text rules turn them into cards on the spot. The real app, the one that uses AI, is behind the link above.
Fifteen minutes, measured
This is a browser-only tool, and that is all it isIt splits the text you paste by rule, and nothing else. WeSolve+ is a different thing entirely: it reads your whole PDF with AI, writes the reasoning behind every question, speaks the chapter back to you, and remembers what you missed so it can return it. Try the real app now, free!
This tool uses text rules, not AI, and it counts nothing about you. It exists to show the unit: one topic's notes produce roughly one sitting, and a sitting is the thing worth measuring rather than an evening. Your text stays in the browser and is never sent anywhere.
A day, minute by minute
Ten minutes in the morning, twenty at midday, five minutes of break: the day comes back as its actual shape rather than as a total. That shape is where the useful surprise usually is. Most people discover they have two productive fragments and one long stretch that produced almost nothing, and knowing which is which is worth more than adding them up.
The streak is doing one job, and it is not the job you think
It is not a measure of progress. It exists to get you to open the app on the evening you were going to skip, which is a real problem worth solving and a small one to solve. Treat it as attendance. The moment a habit counter starts deciding what you study rather than whether you study, it has stopped helping.
Any number you optimise stops measuring
Chase hours and you will sit longer. Chase quizzes answered and you will take short easy ones. This is a well known effect and it is not a reason to avoid measuring, only a reason to know which number you are steering by. Steer by the topics that moved, and let the hours be a description rather than a target.
Score and quizzes answered, read correctly
Both are volume, and volume is the easiest thing in any system to inflate. What they are genuinely good for is spotting a fortnight where nothing happened, which is obvious in the record and invisible in memory. For what changed rather than what accumulated, the topic lists in weak topic analysis are the honest instrument.
Thirty days, and against last week
Single sessions are noise. Tiredness, a hard chapter, a bad evening: none of them mean anything on their own, and reading a bad Tuesday as a trend is the most common mistake people make with their own data. Thirty days is long enough for a real pattern, and the comparison against the previous week is what turns a chart into an answer. Detailed comparative analysis sits in the premium tier.
It builds itself, which is the only reason it survives
Nothing here asks you to log anything. Manual study logs work for about nine days and then quietly stop, because logging is a second task competing with the first. The record here is a by product of answering questions, so it keeps being accurate on exactly the weeks you are too busy to maintain anything. See the study planner and pricing.
| Number | Good for | Bad for |
|---|---|---|
| Total hours | Spotting an empty fortnight | Proving anything was learned |
| Streak | Getting you to start tonight | Deciding what to study |
| Quizzes answered | Volume over time | Depth, it rewards easy sets |
| Score | A rough trend | One session, that is noise |
| Minute breakdown of a day | Finding the dead stretch | Comparing two people |
| Thirty day comparison | Real patterns | Fast feedback, it needs time |
Sources used on this page
- Goodhart's law
- Habit
- Quantified self
- Self-monitoring
- Time management
- Gamification
- Goal setting
- Learning analytics
- Active recall
- Spaced repetition
- Testing effect
- Forgetting curve
- Generation effect
- Judgment of learning
- Metacognition
- Formative assessment
- Desirable difficulty
- Educational technology
- Study skills
- Flashcard
- Cloze test
- Test (assessment)
- Educational assessment
- Mastery learning
- Instructional scaffolding
- Item analysis
- Overlearning
- Study guide
- Note-taking
What does study tracking record?
Total hours, your streak, your score, how many quizzes you have answered, and a minute by minute breakdown of the day. It builds from ordinary use rather than from anything you log.
Is a long streak a sign of progress?
It is a sign of attendance, which is worth having. It stops helping the moment it starts deciding what you study rather than whether you study.
Why not just aim for more hours?
Because any number you optimise stops measuring what it was for. Chase hours and you sit longer; chase quiz count and you take short easy ones.
How long before the data means something?
Around thirty days. Single sessions are noise, and reading a bad Tuesday as a trend is the most common mistake people make with their own numbers.
Do I have to log my sessions?
No, and that is the point. Manual logs survive about nine days because logging competes with studying. This record is a by product of answering questions.
What is in the premium tier?
The detailed comparative analysis: thirty days and the comparison against the previous week. The everyday numbers are not behind it.
Last updated: 2026-08-15