This guide walks through the evidence and the daily routine that follows from it.
Retrieval is the speed trick that survives measurement
The fastest known route into long term memory is pulling material out rather than pushing it in again. In Karpicke and Roediger's 2008 experiment in Science, learners who kept retrieving vocabulary recalled about 80 percent a week later, while those who kept studying without retrieval landed near 36 percent: the same study time, more than double the retention. That gap is the whole argument for practicing with questions instead of with your eyes.
Spacing: when you return matters as much as how
One long session today loses to two short ones spread out, and the effect has a measured shape. Cepeda and colleagues' 2008 study found the sweet spot for the gap between reviews at roughly 10 to 20 percent of the time until the test: reviewing about a day later for a week away, about a month later for most of a year away. You do not need to compute this yourself; a scheduler that returns cards on that curve does the bookkeeping.
Make the material do work at encoding
Speed also comes from how the fact first goes in. Explaining a definition in your own words, connecting it to an example you already know, and asking why it holds: all three deepen the first trace; this is what Craik and Lockhart's levels of processing model calls deep encoding, and researchers group these moves under elaboration, and they cost seconds, not sessions. The practical version: when a card comes back wrong, do not just flip it again. Say why the right answer is right once, out loud or in writing, and the next return usually sticks.
The techniques that feel fast and measure slow
Highlighting and rereading dominate real study time and sit at the bottom of the measured league table: Dunlosky and colleagues' 2013 review rated both as low utility, while practice testing and distributed practice took the top ratings. The reason they persist is the fluency illusion, the warm feeling of recognizing a page, which is not the same skill as producing the answer with the book closed.
A twenty-minute daily routine, and where the app sits
The evidence compresses into a small routine: a short retrieval round on today's material, the scheduler's returns from earlier days, and one honest pass over whatever came back wrong. WeSolve+ builds that routine from your own PDFs and photographed notes, generating the questions and timing the returns. One honesty note on numbers: we do not yet publish usage statistics from the app, so every figure in this article belongs to the named research, not to WeSolve+. The pairing to start with is the recall versus rereading comparison and the schedule guide.
By Mert Erarslan (Exam prep and subject routes)
Sources used on this page
- Forgetting curve
- Spaced repetition
- Testing effect
- Active recall
- Distributed practice
- Roediger and Karpicke 2006, test-enhanced learning
- Karpicke and Roediger 2008, Science
- Dunlosky et al. 2013, technique effectiveness review
- Cepeda et al. 2008, the spacing experiment
- Murre and Dros 2015, the Ebbinghaus replication
- Metacognition
- Long-term memory
- Desirable difficulty
- Study skills
- Flashcard
- Leitner system
- Elaborative rehearsal
- Levels of Processing model
- Chunking (psychology)
- Working memory
- Memorization
- Mnemonic
- Method of loci
- Encoding (memory)
- Recall (memory)
- Overlearning
- Practice (learning method)
- Highlighter
What is the single fastest way to memorize?
Retrieval practice: in the cited 2008 experiment it roughly doubled recall a week later compared with restudying, nearly 80 percent versus about 36 percent.
How long should sessions be?
Short and repeated beats long and single: spacing reviews at roughly 10 to 20 percent of the time until your test is the measured sweet spot.
Is highlighting useless?
It marks where facts live; it does not put them in memory. The 2013 review rated it low utility, so treat it as navigation, not study.
Does this work for formulas and diagrams?
Yes: retrieval works on anything you can pose as a prompt, and photographed diagrams become label and relation questions.
Where do WeSolve+ numbers come from?
The app does not publish its own usage statistics yet; the percentages here come from the named studies linked in the text.
Last updated: 2026-08-15 · Written with AI assistance and reviewed before publishing.
